賣港賊

當大胸、大奶、大乳、露點、露底成為了新聞重點什至頭條,當”盛傳”、”知情人說”、”知情者說”、等等成為了香港傳媒,特別是娛樂版報導常見的資料來源 ,問題便來了。”盛傳”的報導往往可以隨便亂寫一通。記者寫得多,讀者讀得多,都會令到讀者分析能力大降,有長遠的不良後果。

早前我寫了以下幾句,暫時沒有用到,但會用到的一天似乎又近了。

“我訂閱蘋果日報和壹周刊多年。今天,我帶一點傷心地決定跟蘋果說暫別/再見,訂閱過期後,我將不再續訂。”

早前跟一老人朋友討論不再續訂蘋果的問題時,差點給他罵我做了個”賣港賊”。他說小了蘋果,從那裡找人出來代港人跟中央與香港特區政府說句話。

唉,明年蘋果日報訂閱到期前,看看怎樣吧。唉,難題難題。

*******

8 Nov, 2009 Update: 讀”升呢女模大食實錄 – Jessica C.拖仔喪o趙“,我便想到做”狗仔隊出更”的所謂”記者”,可能之前冇積點陰德,所以現世要做”狗仔隊”。跟蹤,偷拍,加上扺死的旁白等等,都無助由老板下至記者的陰德,唉。

5 Responses to 賣港賊

  1. Haricot says:

    I read Apple Daily News thru articles posted by other bloggers. It’s true, sometimes citizens need an independent voice that is not a “mouth-piece” for those in power.

  2. 師奶仔 says:

    蘋果一點都不尊重女性,報導嘩衆取寵,言論自由應括對別人尊重同專業操守在內。

  3. kempton says:

    Hari,

    An independent voice is important but can they (Apple Daily, etc) at least do it with less of a double standard? Keep being voice of democracy and for the people. But when they post and use those breasts and undies pictures, don’t lecture the models. The sick ones are Apple & others’ photographers and their editors.

    師奶仔,

    “不尊重女性”同”報導嘩衆取寵”都是不太可取的事情。但最令我反感的是蘋果的雙重標準。又要影大胸、露底,又要教訓些”o靚模。雙重標準得與只向錢看的假奶粉奸商冇分別。

    打個比方,要賣大胸(或奶粉),就要賣真的。

  4. Haricot says:

    I have no direct access to Apple Daily and don’t know much abt their racy photos and gossip columns. Based on what you said, it does sound like double-standard.

  5. kempton says:

    Next time you see a physical copy of the magazines in HK (or one of those Chinatown book stores), you will see how far the likes of 壹週刋 has gone.

%d bloggers like this: