陶傑的《所以》

引用陶傑今天的”名筆“一文,

只有美國才有所謂健筆,因為相對之下,美國人比較文盲,英國的知識界人人都能寫,所以《經濟學人》周刊的文字,沒有一篇署名。

有時讀陶先生的文章要花點精神,因為不知陶先生那時是有見地的寫,那時是空口說白話的亂寫一通。

The Economist’s US West Coast Correspondent Mr. Andreas Kluth answers the question ” 為何《經濟學人》周刊的文字,沒有一篇署名” well in his post “Why The Economist has no bylines?

While I admire Mr. To‘s beautiful proses and seemingly endless knowledge, I am also getting sick of Mr. To‘s “talent” in creating “facts” out of thin air when he feels the urge.

Am I too cynical to think Mr. 陶傑 should be nicknamed “Mr. To Creative Facts“? And am I too harsh to think HK readers don’t really care and, worst, are not intelligent enough to tell the differences?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: