陶傑的《所以》

引用陶傑今天的”名筆“一文,

只有美國才有所謂健筆,因為相對之下,美國人比較文盲,英國的知識界人人都能寫,所以《經濟學人》周刊的文字,沒有一篇署名。

有時讀陶先生的文章要花點精神,因為不知陶先生那時是有見地的寫,那時是空口說白話的亂寫一通。

The Economist’s US West Coast Correspondent Mr. Andreas Kluth answers the question ” 為何《經濟學人》周刊的文字,沒有一篇署名” well in his post “Why The Economist has no bylines?

While I admire Mr. To‘s beautiful proses and seemingly endless knowledge, I am also getting sick of Mr. To‘s “talent” in creating “facts” out of thin air when he feels the urge.

Am I too cynical to think Mr. 陶傑 should be nicknamed “Mr. To Creative Facts“? And am I too harsh to think HK readers don’t really care and, worst, are not intelligent enough to tell the differences?

About these ads

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: